Joe S's Email to Representative Robert B. Aderholt
07/02/2011 16:32
I gave you a grade of B.
I would like your response, preferably by email, to the question I pose near the end of this letter - and do not use the CRS Memos (discussed later) as the basis for your response..
Many in Congress are puzzled as to why Congressional approval polls routinely show numbers in the 10 to 20 percent approval range. This letter explains the lack of approval. Millions of Americans are wondering why Congress is trying so hard to defend the indefensible and most of us think you are aware of the Presidential ineligibility and, rather than taking appropriate action, you choose to hide under the bed so the boogeymen of "race rioting", "civil unrest", "legal turmoil", etc. will leave the room. Those "bats flitting about" to scare citizens will not work as most people realize by far the more dangerous thing is to NOT correct the problem decisively and quickly. Once the daylight of truth is shined upon them, the bats will stop flitting about. The longer the situation is allowed to continue, the greater the damage to our country and all of its laws and institutions. Only a fool would consider it a partisan political or racial issue. It is, instead, a matter of law. There are some of you in Congress who have never delved beyond the recent Congregational Research Memos (CRS Memos) and the false and shameful information presented there.
All Congressional offices received copies of the two CRS Memos (dated April 3, 2009 and March 18, 2010 and authored by Jack Maskell) that purported to explain the Presidential eligibility of Barack Obama shortly after his election. These CRS Memos were routinely quoted (largely verbatim) and sent to at least many, many thousands or perhaps hundreds of thousands of supposedly benighted constituents in a rather "Oracle at Delphi" set of pronouncements to explain why their questions concerning his eligibility were groundless. Both of these CRS Memos contained many errors of both commission and of omission. You have made grave strategic errors in depending upon these CRS Memos and in presuming the ignorance of those asking the questions. Another CRS transmission to Congressman Bilbray (June 5, 2009) was also especially egregious:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=226697
Unfortunately for you, these Memos were nothing but thinly disguised lies promulgated by political operatives and assembled by Jack Maskell and perhaps others who even had the audacity to try to change the wording of Supreme Court decisions by clever manipulation to make it seem that the Constitutional requirement of a "natural born Citizen" was satisfied under the law by being merely a "citizen" as though this were the same as a "natural born Citizen". IT IS NOT!! The real law says "born in the US of two US citizen parents" - as simple as that. Check THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGJdN2KPf0g
The Supreme Court precedent defining "natural born Citizen" is the 1875 case Minor v. Happersett, q.v.. I urge you to read its definition of "nbC". This legal precedent is part of the law of our land and has not only never been overturned or changed but has been upheld and endorsed by several later decisions. In law, I think that is called binding precedent or "stare decisis". It did not at all stem from English Common Law as many Obama "hopefuls" claim. Stop falling for the lie of "citizen" meaning the same as "nbC".
You have been lied to big time by not only Barack Obama himself but by what are clearly political operatives within the Congregational Research Service in the persons of Jack Maskell and Jerry Mansfield. To see how grossly you have misinformed your constituents, please read this thorough refutation of the CRS
Memos (read first all the parts that are linked as "Part 1" & "Part 2" within the link below and then proceed from there):
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/02/grand-finale-presidential-eligibility/
It seems you are either ignorant or stupid and someone once observed that ignorance may be corrected but stupid is forever. Which you are remains to be seen. Perhaps you are not aware of what is called "Misprison of Felony" in Title 18 criminal codes of our country or in the section that immediately precedes it in those codes:
"TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 3
§ 3. Accessory after the fact
Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed,
receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his
apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the
fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or
(notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine
prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable
by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15
years."
In view of the fact that all 535 of you have witnessed not only the violation of the Constitutional "nbC" mandate (which Obama had verbally and in a signed, notarized statement claimed to be) and in view of the fact that you all have witnessed his commission of felonious criminal document fraud with his placement of his "original birth certificate" image on the White House website, you should be on notice that you or your staffs may fall under the Title 18 sections mentioned above; especially since the WHBC has been reported definitively to the FBI as an image of a forged document by Douglas Vogt. Even if this WHBC were not "altered", it alone is proof that Obama is not eligible to hold the office as it shows his father was not a US citizen at Obama’s birth; clear proof of his ineligibility under our laws mentioned above and you have been notified of that by citizens who themselves are not guilty of Misprison of Felony since they have notified you or your staff with some so notified perhaps being guilty of active concealment of a known felony in view of the methods used to fend off inquiries of eligibility. Please read this which should properly be called "Forgery For Dummies!!!": http://www.wnd.com/files/Obama_LFBC_Report_final_draft.pdf
Congress should launch a thorough investigation of the Congressional Research Service since they were created by statute law to operate impartially and are clearly not doing that. To see this and for an idea of the influence on the CRS apparently being gained by uber-Socialist George Soros, read this:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/27/without-partisan-bias/
Perhaps you intend to continue being possible accessories after the fact also - so please read that law above thoughtfully. For your reading pleasure, I have also included my letter to the FBI on the document fraud - it went to both Director Mueller in DC and to the Honolulu FBI office. Note the HI natality law data and the proper sequencing of the investigation - which should be Congressionally mandated at once to be done by the FBI without delay.
My question is - how much longer are you going to delay in keeping a criminal (on these and other counts) in the office he now holds and for which he has never shown himself to be eligible??? Waiting for 2012 won’t do!!! Remember your Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution!! Please respond to the below email address.
Joe E. Sheldon, citizen jsheldon@socal.rr.com
... and the FBI letter referenced follows ...
FBI Headquarters July 1, 2011 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Attn: Robert S. Mueller, III; Director
Re: Information sent to the FBI regarding possible criminal acts of Barack Hussein Obama - URL for analysis of the crime outlined by Mr. Vogt http://www.archiveindex.com/Obamas_Certificate_Forgery.html
AND http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=308397
Dear Director Mueller:
Several weeks ago I wrote you requesting that your Bureau initiate a criminal investigation of the forged birth certificate image posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 (the WHBC) based upon the Vogt complaint. I have not received a response from you but have instead seen reports from those claiming to be in your office in HI stating that not only is there no such investigation but there will not be one as - per your HI office - the Vogt complaint and the second one mentioned above is merely nonsense and of no merit.
This attitude means your FBI office in HI is taking the position that there has been no such crime without even investigating the matter. That puts you in opposition to the belief of millions of American citizens - looking at only three of many videos showing different proofs of the crime lists a total of over 1,500,000 views - who sincerely believe with good reason that the WHBC is an image in fact representing a forged document thereby making it an instance of felonious criminal document fraud. Do you as Bureau Director ascribe to this belief?
Your HI office apparently waves away the possibility of a serious crime as non-existent without a serious investigation of the matter. Is the FBI now in the business of playing the political protection racket as indicated by the statements from your office? On what basis does a response such as that I mentioned become generated? Is this the official position of your FBI office, that of FBI headquarters and/or Director Mueller?? If so, why is that the position - what factual basis has led you to assume such an unjustified observation?? It is the forged document and not Obama’s eligibility that is being questioned. Please refute each point in the two complaints.
On the website of Mario Apuzzo, a constitutional lawyer who presented a definitive legal case to the Supreme Court (which the court declined to hear meaning there was no discovery and no presentation of evidence or arguments to the court; it does not mean it was judged in any manner) there was recently this post by someone who had contacted your HI office and spoke of it to HI Senator Slom:
"The voters of this Country have a compelling interest in discovering the truth, where as it maybe what was released was possibly the truth, but we will never know unless it can be seen by professional authorities. I spoke with your FBI Dept 2 times recently on June 16, 2011, the man told me that this Birth Certificate issue is just rumors that have been spread around by the internet and the Birthers, he did not let me talk at all, but he did state that they are not investigating the report that Doug Vogt sent to them. I find this egregious and disrespectful; the American people have a right to know the truth."
It may be that the FBI employee so speaking was merely voicing his own opinion but even if he were, I’d like to know who authorized him to speak in such a manner on the subject. Do the employees there run the asylum - or was this perhaps you making the statement? If you think the WHBC valid, then investigate and publish the detailed results since the two above complaints are quite detailed and clearly show the WHBC is a forgery!!!
Please email your response at my below email address and explain why my tax dollars are gathering dust in NOT investigating what has been shown by several different experts to be a fraudulent document generated by the HI DOH rather than the actual contemporaneous birth document on file in Kapiolani Hospital attested to by the doctor delivering Obama (or whatever his name is). Please also explain why you choose to not follow the investigative steps listed in my June 2, 2011 letter in this matter. I’ve again included the FBI Enclosures ...
Joe E. Sheldon, citizen jsheldon@socal.rr.com
(Eclosure follows) (JES Encl. 1)
Note that in the enclosure the names used are as those originally specified in HI laws ... these names have recently been dramatically (and misleadingly) changed for political purposes, confusing everyone. When former Director of the DOH Fukino specified that Obama was a "natural orn citizen" she was speaking with reference to a HI determination of the term (which she herself could solely and legally determine) and NOT with respect to any US Constitutional meaning - but this was never stated. That would be good for a HI driver’s license no doubt but not for a license to the Oval Office. It is abundantly clear that the former Director (though a medical doctor) took upon herself - intentionally or not - the cause of American legal justice along with an interpretation of what constitutes a natural born Citizen mentioned in the Constitution, through a birth which she did not witness, about 50 years after it occurred, in a location she did not witness and cannot verify, while also proclaiming the person’s successful fulfillment of Constitutional eligibility requirements. To my knowledge she is also not a Constitutional legal expert.
===================
excerpt from The Mombosan Son, Chapter 5
Hawaii is the only state in U.S. history to offer an alternative form of an ‘Original (Vault) Birth Certificate’ which does not require an eyewitness to the birth, or natal history attributable to any location other than the State of issuance.
...
There is a chronological overlap between 1959 and 1972 in the official time of the Certificate of Hawaiian Birth Program during which the State of Hawaii issued both a ‘Certificate of Hawaiian Birth’ and a ‘Certificate of Live Birth’, both under the umbrella title of ‘Original (Vault) Birth Certificate’, but under completely different circumstances. The documentation used to validate one’s birth decided which certificate was issued. The distinction between the two documents was determined by whether a person’s birth was attended firsthand in the State of Hawaii by a witness defined in Hawaii Revised Statute 338-5 and 338-6, or whether it was determined by an official of the state of Hawaii through secondary sources showing that a person was born in the state of Hawaii sometime in the past. Therefore, the difference between the two documents is that one is issued as a result of an eyewitness to the birth, the other is issued by the decision of an administrator or judge.
"The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth program was established in 1911, during the territorial era, to register a person born in Hawaii who was one year old or older and whose birth had not been previously registered in Hawaii. The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth Program was terminated in 1972, during the statehood era."
In the description above, the Department of Health doesn’t include that judges and administrators can and do make decisions to grant ‘Certificates of Hawaiian Birth’ based on information provided through secondary identification documents, personal testimony and support records from later in the applicant’s life, long after the birth took place. When the courts make the final decision, they declare the decision irrefutable and correct.
excerpt from The Mombosan Son, Chapter 8 -
Thus, the state of Hawaii gives itself permission to recognize Obama as a natural-born citizen by its own autonomous definition despite the fact that its administrative declaration is in complete contradiction to federal Constitutional law which draws discernment as follows:
"The difference between the synthetic endowment of natural-born status provided by the state of Hawaii as opposed to the federal Constitutional requirement is that the federal mandate requires the candidate to actually be born under medical verification and federal legal jurisdictions. The birth of a natural born civilian must be documented with a standard NVSD "Certificate of Live Birth" and it must be signed by a licensed professional qualified to witness and attest to the legal and medical characteristics of a "live birth" at the moment of the birth, within the geographic region affording U.S. Constitutional protection for the witnesses and the child."
Notes for Agent Team: (JES Encl. 2)
1. Obama has released in writing and by speech his "original birth certificate". Since most of us are only born once, that would most certainly mean the Kapiolani Hospital where the birth on U. S. Soil occurred as a delivery-MD-witnessed live birth of the person plus witness signatures and various metrics such as height, weight, etc. The terms used would be as on page 231 (race and color) and the form of the BC would be as specified by page 228 of http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsus_1961_1.pdf
2. Also at Kapiolani the hospital should be able to present the admission, treatment medical records, and discharge records for the mother as well as treatment and discharge records for the child.
3. The Investigating team should take with them two sets of court orders; one set for Kapiolani and one for the HI DOH. Each set should specify all documents to the person/persons involved be provided no matter by what name or from what country of document origin.
4. Kapiolani should be investigated first since there is a very high likelihood of getting meaningful results quickly - e.g., no records for the person(s) and therefore no US birth. The DOH will still need to be investigated but doing it second would help focus the investigation on the criminal fraud perpetrated.
5. The Agent Team when at DOH should be made aware that if the WHBC has been constructed by piecing together portions of different documents that ALL documents should be obtained even if not used in the fraud directly. It is even possible under HI laws that a foreign BC might be on file at the DOH or that one or more documents may be sealed (and should also be included). Lists showing access to the documents should also be obtained for possible interviews of certain individuals.
6. Also, the Agent Team must be made aware that in HI law is is possible to have an already born infant examined in a hospital (even if not born there) by a medical doctor who is required by HI law to sign the document as though he witnessed the birth (when he did not) and thereby under HI law making the hospital used for this examination the birth location even if the birth took place elsewhere (including in a different country).
7. For any DOH investigation, the Agent Team needs to be aware that there are several possible types of HI "birth certificates" which may even all be on file at the same time. These have never been identified by the public DOH statements, but should be. Included might be a birth certificate from a different country, a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth, a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, a Delayed Birth Certificate, an Amended Birth Certificate, a Vault Copy Birth Certificate, a Certification of Live Birth, and even others. Having the word "Live" in the title is misleading since it is not the same in HI parlance as a medically-certified live birth but may really be an administratively-certified birth (or not even a real birth at all).
8. Note that in Phase 1 of the investigation done at Kapiolani Hospital, if the natality and other hospital records do not exactly match the WHBC then the fraud of that document is not only proven but the man involved is shown to be ineligible to hold the office he now occupies since he cannot then be a natural born citizen and is also a felon. Both he and his wife should be held incommunicado and under guard - due to the serious flight risk to some other country - without any means to communicate with others (Including radios, telephones., or cell phones of any sort) while part two of the investigation proceeds at the HI Department of Health.
9. For a new WHBC forgery analysis by an internationally recognized Adobe software expert, please read this which should properly be called "Forgery For Dummies!!!":
http://www.wnd.com/files/Obama_LFBC_Report_final_draft.pdf
Go back